#41
hi
Post rating: +
new sig
#42
Kurdt
Post rating: ~
is the theory of kyriarchy properly dialectical
#43
Post rating: ~
Why can't we all just get along?
#44
Post rating: ~
trans* women & female-only restrooms: be objective please
#45
Post rating: ~

prohairesis posted:

at what point did communism truly seal its fate of collapse? sino-soviet split, change of industry policy? 1 answer please


communism still has a chance but with the way things are going right now and the behavior of communist scholars and leaders in recent years i'd have to say its nearing the point of no return pretty soon, there needs to be a huge overhaul of the contemporary communist ideology (pardon the vulgar term) very soon if communism is to be saved

#46
Post rating: ~

HenryKrinkle posted:

new sig


this is not a question sorry pal try again!

#47
Post rating: +

fape posted:

prohairesis posted:

at what point did communism truly seal its fate of collapse? sino-soviet split, change of industry policy? 1 answer please

communism still has a chance but with the way things are going right now and the behavior of communist scholars and leaders in recent years i'd have to say its nearing the point of no return pretty soon, there needs to be a huge overhaul of the contemporary communist ideology (pardon the vulgar term) very soon if communism is to be saved



Thats a good point but whats a better point

#48
Kurdt
Post rating: ~
Let’s suppose that you, or I, or Skroti Wantuptis, or someone we care about from afar, is raped while unconscious in a way that causes no direct physical harm — no injury, no pregnancy, no disease transmission. (Note: The Steubenville rape victim, according to all the accounts I’ve read, was not even aware that she’d been sexually assaulted until she learned about it from the Internet some days later.) Despite the lack of physical damage, we are shocked, appalled and horrified at the thought of being treated in this way, and suffer deep trauma as a result. Ought the law discourage such acts of rape? Should they be illegal?
#49
Post rating: ~
David Lee Roth or Sammy Hagar?

Enver Hoxha or Marshal Josip Broz Tito?
#50
Post rating: ~

gyrofry posted:

is the theory of kyriarchy properly dialectical


privilege theory is red herring bullshit created by the high class to delude those pushing for justice by creating false or unnecessary dilemmas

#51
Post rating: +
where can i get infinite bread
#52
Post rating: ~

ArisVelouchiotis posted:

Why can't we all just get along?


free will dictates that there will always be a dissenting opinion

#53
Post rating: +
What's the most revolutionary show on television to watch
#54
Post rating: ~

prohairesis posted:

trans* women & female-only restrooms: be objective please


its ultimately up to the establishment which houses the restroom to determine the need for gender-inclusive restrooms dependent on, like, the crowd that frequents the establishment. but i myself think yes

#55
Post rating: ~
assuming that maoist third worldist analysis is correct & we must wait to be liberated by the true proletarian masses of the world, is then all organizational activity in the first world fruitless? is a manner of ‘propaganda of the deed’ in order to demoralize and humiliate the Western ruling class the only possibility, a la 70s marxist assassination squad, however minute the impact of such political violence? cheers
#56
Post rating: ~

Crow posted:

fape posted:
prohairesis posted:
at what point did communism truly seal its fate of collapse? sino-soviet split, change of industry policy? 1 answer please
communism still has a chance but with the way things are going right now and the behavior of communist scholars and leaders in recent years i'd have to say its nearing the point of no return pretty soon, there needs to be a huge overhaul of the contemporary communist ideology (pardon the vulgar term) very soon if communism is to be saved


Thats a good point but whats a better point

it fell along with mao

#57
Post rating: ~

gyrofry posted:

Let’s suppose that you, or I, or Skroti Wantuptis, or someone we care about from afar, is raped while unconscious in a way that causes no direct physical harm — no injury, no pregnancy, no disease transmission. (Note: The Steubenville rape victim, according to all the accounts I’ve read, was not even aware that she’d been sexually assaulted until she learned about it from the Internet some days later.) Despite the lack of physical damage, we are shocked, appalled and horrified at the thought of being treated in this way, and suffer deep trauma as a result. Ought the law discourage such acts of rape? Should they be illegal?


of course, the main stigma that goes along with being raped is that ones body was abused in the most awful manner (accdg to common, conemporary views on "body"), and even the knowledge that that had happened to one, without memory of it, could very fairly be traumatizing

#58
Post rating: ~

ArisVelouchiotis posted:

David Lee Roth or Sammy Hagar?

Enver Hoxha or Marshal Josip Broz Tito?


i'm not answering this shitty question

#59
Post rating: -

parabolart posted:

where can i get infinite bread


that question is really vague / doesnt conoform to the topic i wish the questions to be asked about sorry pal try again!

#60
Post rating: ~

thirdplace posted:

What's the most revolutionary show on television to watch


The Hard Times of Rj Berger

#61
Post rating: ~

prohairesis posted:

assuming that maoist third worldist analysis is correct & we must wait to be liberated by the true proletarian masses of the world, is then all organizational activity in the first world fruitless? is a manner of ‘propaganda of the deed’ in order to demoralize and humiliate the Western ruling class the only possibility, a la 70s marxist assassination squad, however minute the impact of such political violence? cheers


1. no and yes, in that organizational activity in itself is not fruitless, but any attempt at organization within the first world at this point in time is, especially in the united states

2. i side very whole-heartedly with the idea of political violence as a means to reach an end, though i do not believe it to be the only possible way to incite a revolution

#62
Post rating: ~
seeing this gap in questions im gonna go ahead and get dinner, i guess if you guys want to keep asking me stuff i'll get to all of your questions when i get back or if you would prefer to wait for me to return to ask them thats fine too, whatever, bbl
#63
Post rating: ~

fape posted:

1. no and yes, in that organizational activity in itself is not fruitless, but any attempt at organization within the first world at this point in time is, especially in the united states



ohhhhh okay, so we move to the third world orrr? also what is to be done about the Very Poor People in the U.S. A. during this ban on organization? we eat them or???

#64
Post rating: +
fapeist first-worldism ftw
#65
Post rating: +

fape posted:

ArisVelouchiotis posted:

David Lee Roth or Sammy Hagar?

Enver Hoxha or Marshal Josip Broz Tito?


i'm not answering this shitty question



There are two questions in that post, guy. The one question was just thrown out there as a silly little joke but I'm actually serious about the other one. I'll ask again:

David Lee Roth or Sammy Hagar?

#66
Post rating: ~

SariBari posted:

fape posted:
1. no and yes, in that organizational activity in itself is not fruitless, but any attempt at organization within the first world at this point in time is, especially in the united states


ohhhhh okay, so we move to the third world orrr? also what is to be done about the Very Poor People in the U.S. A. during this ban on organization? we eat them or???


who is "we", in both cases?

#67
Post rating: +
why are you a gaey fayhget?
#68
Post rating: -

Impper posted:

why are you a gaey fayhget?


that question is really vague / doesnt conoform to the topic i wish the questions to be asked about sorry pal try again!

#69
Post rating: ~
what are the implications of the indisputable fact that jews control the media and are overrepresented in law, academia, finance and government
#70
Post rating: -

EmanuelaOrlandi posted:

what are the implications of the indisputable fact that jews control the media and are overrepresented in law, academia, finance and government


as with many groups of people who distance themselves ideologically from other groups, such as the masons, and the mormons, and the muslims, and the jesuits, and just about every group which groups itself in that fashion, jews tend to be more willing to offer help to other people within their group than people who are not included in their group, which leads to their being abundant within certain industries

#71
Post rating: ~
wrong. try again.
#72
Post rating: +

EmanuelaOrlandi posted:

wrong. try again.


theyre lizard people who are secretly in control of everything

#73
Post rating: +
correct.
#74
Post rating: ~
whey are you a grey faget?
#75
Post rating: ~
Mike or Joel?
#76
Post rating: ~

stegosaurus posted:

whey are you a grey faget?


that question is really vague / doesnt conoform to the topic i wish the questions to be asked about sorry pal try again!

#77
Post rating: ~

Zen_Punk posted:

Mike or Joel?


that question is really vague / doesnt conoform to the topic i wish the questions to be asked about sorry pal try again!

#78
Post rating: ~
What is love?
#79
Post rating: ~
Was Henry Krinkle`s page two snipe total ownage or whatÉ
#80
Post rating: ~
How much should state law respect the wishes of the actually existing God