#41

Cycloneboy posted:
why should you care about anything, if it doesn't make a difference in your life. - a socialist



people generally care about dumb mens rights bullshit because theyre misogynists who want to use women as sex objects and not face any of the consequences. are you just dumb or is your aspie asexuality tied up with a bunch of weird gender prejudices. why am i even asking this question

#42

Cycloneboy posted:
a dude has sex with a woman one time, and by mutual consent does not wear a condom because she's on the pill. except, actually, she is not on the pill, and gets pregnant and now he has to pay out the ass for a kid. please justify this without appealing to biology-as-God.



i hope you realise the only scenario in which your bizarre hypothetical makes sense is WELFARE QUEENS

#43

discipline posted:
yeah how can we sit here (as good socialists) on the sidelines when men are FORCED by the LAW to give their hard earned $$$ to lying manipulative whores and bitches!!!!

ah yes, because whether or not something is correct is based upon how aesthetically similar it is to other socialist doctrines.

fatherhood, in every meaningful sense, is not a product of the semen. genetics is no basis for legal policy. a parent should be judged just as surely a parent if they are adoptive as if they are genetic; and, similarly, a person who is not a parent should be judged just as surely as not a parent whether or not they have higher-than-average genetic similarities to the child.

deadken posted:
people generally care about dumb mens rights bullshit because theyre misogynists who want to use women as sex objects and not face any of the consequences. are you just dumb or is your aspie asexuality tied up with a bunch of weird gender prejudices. why am i even asking this question

implications of mental illness and drawing equivalencies between that and bigotry. nice. NOT

#44

Cycloneboy posted:
implications of mental illness and drawing equivalencies between that and bigotry. nice. NOT



its not my fault youre an untermensch

#45

deadken posted:

Cycloneboy posted:
implications of mental illness and drawing equivalencies between that and bigotry. nice. NOT

its not my fault youre an untermensch

now we're literally using nazi terminology. how deep does this rabbit hole go, i wonder?

#46
wow..... godwin much??? cripes
#47
[account deactivated]
#48
Women make less because they are generally less skilled.

Although, Alan Greenspan noted in his biography that women were undervalued by the marketplace, and so he saw hiring them to be of great value. He filled his office with a number of intelligent young ladies.
#49
i mean, the legal system provides for a non-biological father to pay child support for a child he has acted as father to. why in the world should it provide for a biological father to pay child support for a child he has not acted as father to?
#50
even the threads that aren't obvious cyclone honeypots turn out, in the end, to be cyclone honeypots
#51
[account deactivated]
#52

discipline posted:
cycloneboy is still going thru the "girls are icky" stage



to be fair isn't he like 14

#53
[account deactivated]
#54
he is like 16 years old now, so this is pure sexual frustation
#55
come on cycloneboy you can do better than this. when i was 16 i was stealing vehicles and absconding across the country in pursuit of romantic fantasy. neo-lf is hardly the place for a growing young person in this day and age
#56

discipline posted:
women make 70 cents on the dollar kiddo



no they don't

#57

deadken posted:

Cycloneboy posted:
why should you care about anything, if it doesn't make a difference in your life. - a socialist

people generally care about dumb mens rights bullshit because theyre misogynists who want to use women as sex objects and not face any of the consequences. are you just dumb or is your aspie asexuality tied up with a bunch of weird gender prejudices. why am i even asking this question



i'm always interested in posts that assert that the validity of the movement is based on the perceived characteristics of some of its members. during the 1960s and 1970s, there were numerous feminists who called all men rapists, or called for the extermination of males; a few actually committed murder of innocent men. this does not prove that feminism is invalid, does it?

Edited by Goethestein ()

#58
It does, actually. What is called "feminism" should be called "gender equality", and I won't hear otherwise. Feminism is code for misandry.
#59
feminists claim that any other ideology is necessary because feminism is for everyone. similarly many libertarians claim that they are anti-corporation and pro-union and many white supremacists claim that they are not racist but simply trying to preserve their cultural heritage
#60

Goethestein posted:

discipline posted:
women make 70 cents on the dollar kiddo

no they don't



you got him there. in the US it's actually 77 cents. this changes everything

#61
[account deactivated]
#62

discipline posted:
cycloneboy is still going thru the "girls are icky" stage

no i'm not, stop with this genetic fallacy shit.

#63

Cycloneboy posted:

discipline posted:
cycloneboy is still going thru the "girls are icky" stage

no i'm not, stop with this genetic fallacy shit.



lmao

#64

discipline posted:
hey can anyone scare up that graphic about how much land is owned by women worldwide



pretty sure its <1% so no graphic needed.

but you see its ok because they make up for it by being temptresses who steal the essence of unsuspecting young cyclonic boys and thus enter a demonic blood contract to extort a fifth of his hard earned labor in order to better produce her devil-spawn.

#65

deadken posted:
I wasn't being ironic


cool, sorry~

#66

lungfish posted:
It does, actually. What is called "feminism" should be called "gender equality", and I won't hear otherwise. Feminism is code for misandry.



There is nothing wrong with misandry in the context of western machismo bullshit "protector/warrior/earner/drunk" trash concept.

#67
[account deactivated]
#68

discipline posted:
child support? don't make me label you a... NATALIST... who believes in the reactionary bigoted concept of... PARENTHOOD...


privileging genetic parenthood is an attack on adoptive parenthood. sorry about your brain.

#69
i was never precisely sure what the full thrust of british epithet "wanker" was until i encountered cycloneboy
#70
[account deactivated]
#71

discipline posted:
nobody cares that your 14 yr old mom gave you up for adoption and that you hate her and your adoptive parents, cyclonelad. now get some rest. big day at homeschool tomorrow.

so you have no argument at all, except to make some ridiculous and false accusations regarding my motives.

babyfinland posted:
i was never precisely sure what the full thrust of british epithet "wanker" was until i encountered cycloneboy

and i never understood what was supposed to be so bad about islam until i started reading your posts.

#72
"I hereby certify that I am the genetic father of fetus of woman with SSN ____.
I do not want my baby to be born and therefore reject any claim the mother has to my help with it in the future. This form exempts me from both my claim to custody and mandatory support for this potential child.

Signed ____"

Is this what you want cyclone? And can you not see how
1. fucking ice-hearted this is
2. makes you a terrible human being in any culture on the entire planet

I don't give a flying shit how much sense it makes legally, it's an ethical line that you are clearly on the cold side of.
#73

NounsareVerbs posted:
"I hereby certify that I am the genetic father of fetus of woman with SSN ____.
I do not want my baby to be born and therefore reject any claim the mother has to my help with it in the future. This form exempts me from both my claim to custody and mandatory support for this potential child.

Signed ____"

i, the birth mother of this child, henceforth give it up for adoption, thereby doing the same thing this hypothetical person did

NounsareVerbs posted:
Is this what you want cyclone? And can you not see how
1. fucking ice-hearted this is
2. makes you a terrible human being in any culture on the entire planet

I don't give a flying shit how much sense it makes legally, it's an ethical line that you are clearly on the cold side of.

claims of morality backed up by an appeal to emotions and an appeal to popularity. those have always been a very good way to build a moral system. not.

Cycloneboy was probated until (Oct. 6, 2011 06:29:06) for this post!

#74
freak of nature
#75
[account deactivated]
#76

babyfinland posted:
freak of nature

you're such a piece of shit.

#77
cyclonopedophilia
#78
AND FINALLY WE GET TO SEE THE KEWL PROBATION AVATAR !!!
#79

NEOADMINISTRATOR posted:
AND FINALLY WE GET TO SEE THE KEWL PROBATION AVATAR !!!

also i'm still posting.

#80
ARRGH...

EDIT: OOPS, MADE A SIGN BACKWARDS ;P