#1
Post rating: -----

should child pornography be legal? Ok, go!
#2
Post rating: +++++
no, but because nothing should be legal
#3
Post rating: ~

aerdil posted:

no, but because nothing should be legal

#4
Kurdt
Post rating: +

aerdil posted:

no, but because nothing should be legal

Edited by EmanuelaBrolandi ()

#5
tardy on these heaters
Post rating: +

aerdil posted:

no, but because nothing should be legal

Edited by EmanuelaBrolandi ()

#6
Post rating: ~

aerdil posted:

no, but because nothing should be legal



I'm OK with an emptyquote every now and then but this is just jumping on a bandwagon and is not funny / distracts from the thread - EO

Edited by EmanuelaBrolandi ()

#7
Post rating: ~

aerdil posted:

no, but because nothing should be legal

Edited by EmanuelaBrolandi ()

#8
Post rating: +
Both the Child, and Pornography, shoudl be conceptually destroyed. So to ask if child pornography should be legal is well beyond the point - it should be neither legal or illegal, but something in the sense of lumpoff Fartsmithing, a nonsense phrase.
#9
Post rating: +++++

aerdil posted:

no, but because nothing should be legal

Edited by EmanuelaBrolandi ()

#10
[account deactivated]
#11
Post rating: ~

aerdil posted:

no, but because nothing should be legal

Edited by EmanuelaBrolandi ()

#12
sup b*tch
Post rating: ~

aerdil posted:

no, but because nothing should be legal

Edited by EmanuelaBrolandi ()

#13
[account deactivated]
#14
[account deactivated]
#15
YUNG JIRO AKA SHOWA STUNNA AKA
Post rating: ~

aerdil posted:

no, but because nothing should be legal

Edited by EmanuelaBrolandi ()

#16
Goldgelbes Löwenäffchen
Post rating: +
Dont edit my post mother fucker

Edited by GoldenLionTamarin ()

#17
Post rating: +

aerdil posted:

no, but because nothing should be legal

Edited by EmanuelaBrolandi ()

#18
Post rating: ~

aerdil posted:

no, but because nothing should be legal

Edited by EmanuelaBrolandi ()

#19
[account deactivated]
#20
Post rating: ~

aerdil posted:

no, but because nothing should be legal

Edited by EmanuelaBrolandi ()

#21
Post rating: +

aerdil posted:

no, but because nothing should be legal

Edited by EmanuelaBrolandi ()

#22
Goldgelbes Löwenäffchen
Post rating: ~

aerdil posted:

no, but because nothing should be legal

Edited by EmanuelaBrolandi ()

#23
[account deactivated]
#24
Post rating: ~

aerdil posted:

no, but because nothing should be legal

Edited by EmanuelaBrolandi ()

#25
meet me in st louis
Post rating: ~
my mom is guilty of showing photos of a 4yo guidoanselmi sitting naked at the toilet to people. this should be illegal
#26
Online
Post rating: ~

aerdil posted:

no, but because nothing should be legal

Edited by EmanuelaBrolandi ()

#27
FLAWDA
Post rating: ~

aerdil posted:

no, but because nothing should be legal

Edited by EmanuelaBrolandi ()

#28
The Future is Here
Post rating: ~

aerdil posted:

no, but because nothing should be legal

#29
Post rating: ~

aerdil posted:

no, but because nothing should be legal

Edited by EmanuelaBrolandi ()

#30
Post rating: ~
Edited by EmanuelaOrlandi (today 13:03:35)
#31
Post rating: ~

aerdil posted:

no, but because nothing should be legal

Edited by EmanuelaBrolandi ()

#32
egg
Post rating: ~

aerdil posted:


#33
Post rating: ~
no, butt because nothing should be legal
#34
FLAWDA
Post rating: ~
BOYTOUCHER
#35
Post rating: ~
According to Rick Falkvinge, founder of the Swedish Pirate Party, core advocate of the STOP SOPA campaign, and atheist, yes.

http://falkvinge.net/2012/09/07/three-reasons-child-porn-must-be-re-legalized-in-the-coming-decade/
#36
Post rating: ~
well, i am disappointed in this thread. there are two answers to the question, an obvious, emotional, knee-jerk answer, which is flat out wrong, and another that takes a little more logical thought but is more correct