#401
white people arguing about the correct way to enjoy hip hop itt
#402
oh really? breaks you say? i'll have to look into this since you seem to be an "inside source" on this

please, continue to misunderstand what i'm saying and please continue your little history lesson for me :)
#403
im inuit motherfucker
#404
I'm DJ Kool Herc
#405

shermanstick posted:

oh really? breaks you say? i'll have to look into this since you seem to be an "inside source" on this

please, continue to misunderstand what i'm saying and please continue your little history lesson for me


The word you were looking for was "refute," not "misunderstand." hth

#406
i fail to see how you've "refuted" any of my statements or done anything aside from make you look like more of a nerd who listens to music in a vacuum and obviously has little to no human interaction outside of the internet regarding raps. we can play the rap history game and we can keep going back and forth all day but i don't think you "get" "it"
#407

LandBeluga posted:

That's ALWAYS been the way in hip-hop, it's not just "these days." The genesis of the genre was DJs isolating and extending the breaks they were feeling in tracks that were popular at the time, and you don't need me to tell you that. Bottom line, it's weird for you to say that "producers are trying to flip absolutely anything these days" when it's more or less been the rule throughout the genre's history. It's not something that's unique to any region at any time.


no, it hasn't always been that way. you couldn't just flip anything, you could only flip something you could find two copies of and worked on its own as a breakbeat (basically limiting that to easily available soul, funk or disco records) because the sampling technology didn't exist that could manipulate it effectively. people like kool herc were basically just mining their parents old record collections. even when sampling technology came around in an easily available form with the early e-mu shit that was severely limited by available sampling times so there was only a small amount of leeway you had to flip something unusual by manipulating it. that dj premier standard of introducing unconventional sample sources, like less beat oriented jazz records, really only came about because the akai mpc made it easier to do that shit. even then the standard wasn't anything, sampling has for a very long time stuck hard to conventions based around crate digging for very specific types of music that have aesthetics that are deeply entrenched in hiphops aesthetic and available in record stores, like weird soul 45s. with file sharing and easily available music software thanks to the internet its really only now when you can feasibly flip anything because any type of music you can think of is just a few clicks away

Edited by blinkandwheeze ()

#408

shermanstick posted:

im inuit motherfucker



ᑭᓇᐅᕙ? ᐋᕐᖄᐳᖅ

#409
rhizzone rap defense league

#410

shennong posted:

white people arguing about the correct way to enjoy hip hop itt


haha on the real tho this really doesn't have anything to do with privilege or race or whatever, i just think it's weird and reductive to understand any culture as a loose set of aesthetic signifiers or whatever instead of something tied to specific social contexts

#411

blinkandwheeze posted:

shennong posted:

white people arguing about the correct way to enjoy hip hop itt

haha on the real tho this really doesn't have anything to do with privilege or race or whatever, i just think it's weird and reductive to understand any culture as a loose set of aesthetic signifiers or whatever instead of something tied to specific social contexts



it's bizarre that you feel the need to lecture someone who's actually involved in those specific social contexts producing & djing because they happen to have a different understanding of them than you

#412
[account deactivated]
#413

shennong posted:

blinkandwheeze posted:

shennong posted:

white people arguing about the correct way to enjoy hip hop itt

haha on the real tho this really doesn't have anything to do with privilege or race or whatever, i just think it's weird and reductive to understand any culture as a loose set of aesthetic signifiers or whatever instead of something tied to specific social contexts

it's bizarre that you feel the need to lecture someone who's actually involved in those specific social contexts producing & djing because they happen to have a different understanding of them than you


i wasn't trying to lecture him, i didn't really have any problem with what landbeluga was saying until that last comment which i think is basically historically completely wrong, not just as a matter of personal perspective or understanding. sorry if we're speaking in a tone that's negative enough to suggest that, glue cru just gets riled up easy

#414

blinkandwheeze posted:

LandBeluga posted:

That's ALWAYS been the way in hip-hop, it's not just "these days." The genesis of the genre was DJs isolating and extending the breaks they were feeling in tracks that were popular at the time, and you don't need me to tell you that. Bottom line, it's weird for you to say that "producers are trying to flip absolutely anything these days" when it's more or less been the rule throughout the genre's history. It's not something that's unique to any region at any time.

no, it hasn't always been that way. you couldn't just flip anything, you could only flip something you could find two copies of and worked on its own as a breakbeat (basically limiting that to easily available soul, funk or disco records) because the sampling technology didn't exist that could manipulate it effectively. people like kool herc were basically just mining their parents old record collections. even when sampling technology came around in an easily available form with the early e-mu shit that was severely limited by available sampling times so there was only a small amount of leeway you had to flip something unusual by manipulating it. that dj premier standard of introducing unconventional sample sources, like less beat oriented jazz records, really only came about because the akai mpc made it easier to do that shit. even then the standard wasn't anything, sampling has for a very long time stuck hard to conventions based around crate digging for very specific types of music that have aesthetics that are deeply entrenched in hiphops aesthetic and available in record stores, like weird soul 45s. with file sharing and easily available music software thanks to the internet its really only now when you can feasibly flip anything because any type of music you can think of is just a few clicks away


The principles are the same. To generalize, for pioneering DJs and producers it's always been about doing whatever they can conceive of with the sources and technology available. DJs back in the early days of hip-hop were fucking around with any music they could get their hands on, by the standards of their time and locale. There's nothing fundamentally different about a Huntsville producer in 2012 fucking with an indie rock or UK funky sample in Ableton via a Maschine versus a Bronx DJ in 1980 juggling a break from a rock record on two turntables. And if by "only now" you mean "only since over a decade ago" then I'm on-board with that last sentence. Yeah, piracy has gotten easier in the past decade, and music software has become more advanced, but nothing has changed significantly in the last 10 years.

#415

shennong posted:

blinkandwheeze posted:

shennong posted:

white people arguing about the correct way to enjoy hip hop itt

haha on the real tho this really doesn't have anything to do with privilege or race or whatever, i just think it's weird and reductive to understand any culture as a loose set of aesthetic signifiers or whatever instead of something tied to specific social contexts

it's bizarre that you feel the need to lecture someone who's actually involved in those specific social contexts producing & djing because they happen to have a different understanding of them than you



i need a good laugh, so why don't we just post whatever producing and djing thats happening so i can laugh at it and then the glue cru can move on (we run the hip-hop thread)



#416
[account deactivated]
#417
c'mon, tpaine you can do better than that. everyone BRING THEY HEAT



or ARE YALL TOO SOFT
#418
[account deactivated]
#419
ill let the benzos and alcohol take care of that

#420

LandBeluga posted:

blinkandwheeze posted:

LandBeluga posted:

That's ALWAYS been the way in hip-hop, it's not just "these days." The genesis of the genre was DJs isolating and extending the breaks they were feeling in tracks that were popular at the time, and you don't need me to tell you that. Bottom line, it's weird for you to say that "producers are trying to flip absolutely anything these days" when it's more or less been the rule throughout the genre's history. It's not something that's unique to any region at any time.

no, it hasn't always been that way. you couldn't just flip anything, you could only flip something you could find two copies of and worked on its own as a breakbeat (basically limiting that to easily available soul, funk or disco records) because the sampling technology didn't exist that could manipulate it effectively. people like kool herc were basically just mining their parents old record collections. even when sampling technology came around in an easily available form with the early e-mu shit that was severely limited by available sampling times so there was only a small amount of leeway you had to flip something unusual by manipulating it. that dj premier standard of introducing unconventional sample sources, like less beat oriented jazz records, really only came about because the akai mpc made it easier to do that shit. even then the standard wasn't anything, sampling has for a very long time stuck hard to conventions based around crate digging for very specific types of music that have aesthetics that are deeply entrenched in hiphops aesthetic and available in record stores, like weird soul 45s. with file sharing and easily available music software thanks to the internet its really only now when you can feasibly flip anything because any type of music you can think of is just a few clicks away

The principles are the same. To generalize, for pioneering DJs and producers it's always been about doing whatever they can conceive of with the sources and technology available. DJs back in the early days of hip-hop were fucking around with any music they could get their hands on, by the standards of their time and locale. There's nothing fundamentally different about a Huntsville producer in 2012 fucking with an indie rock or UK funky sample in Ableton via a Maschine versus a Bronx DJ in 1980 juggling a break from a rock record on two turntables. And if by "only now" you mean "only since over a decade ago" then I'm on-board with that last sentence.


but that's kinda the point i'm making, you had to post a qualifier that you enjoy g-side despite this obvious or contemporary use of sampling which i don't think is necessary at all, they're just doing what folks have always done, and they do it very creatively and avoid falling into the traps that contemporary sample based production does (mining from already deeply entrenched sources and crate digging cultures). in any case, the technology has been available for the past decade or so but in recent years i think we've seen a revival of sample based production in scenes that have traditionally centered around synthesizer and drum machine workouts thanks to this easy availability, and block beattaz are a good example of that no?

#421
damn drunk as fuck. i dunno what y'all are sayin but I'm upvoting everything Cru
#422

blinkandwheeze posted:

LandBeluga posted:

blinkandwheeze posted:

LandBeluga posted:

That's ALWAYS been the way in hip-hop, it's not just "these days." The genesis of the genre was DJs isolating and extending the breaks they were feeling in tracks that were popular at the time, and you don't need me to tell you that. Bottom line, it's weird for you to say that "producers are trying to flip absolutely anything these days" when it's more or less been the rule throughout the genre's history. It's not something that's unique to any region at any time.

no, it hasn't always been that way. you couldn't just flip anything, you could only flip something you could find two copies of and worked on its own as a breakbeat (basically limiting that to easily available soul, funk or disco records) because the sampling technology didn't exist that could manipulate it effectively. people like kool herc were basically just mining their parents old record collections. even when sampling technology came around in an easily available form with the early e-mu shit that was severely limited by available sampling times so there was only a small amount of leeway you had to flip something unusual by manipulating it. that dj premier standard of introducing unconventional sample sources, like less beat oriented jazz records, really only came about because the akai mpc made it easier to do that shit. even then the standard wasn't anything, sampling has for a very long time stuck hard to conventions based around crate digging for very specific types of music that have aesthetics that are deeply entrenched in hiphops aesthetic and available in record stores, like weird soul 45s. with file sharing and easily available music software thanks to the internet its really only now when you can feasibly flip anything because any type of music you can think of is just a few clicks away

The principles are the same. To generalize, for pioneering DJs and producers it's always been about doing whatever they can conceive of with the sources and technology available. DJs back in the early days of hip-hop were fucking around with any music they could get their hands on, by the standards of their time and locale. There's nothing fundamentally different about a Huntsville producer in 2012 fucking with an indie rock or UK funky sample in Ableton via a Maschine versus a Bronx DJ in 1980 juggling a break from a rock record on two turntables. And if by "only now" you mean "only since over a decade ago" then I'm on-board with that last sentence.

but that's kinda the point i'm making, you had to post a qualifier that you enjoy g-side despite this obvious or contemporary use of sampling which i don't think is necessary at all, they're just doing what folks have always done, and they do it very creatively and avoid falling into the traps that contemporary sample based production does (mining from already deeply entrenched sources and crate digging cultures). in any case, the technology has been available for the past decade or so but in recent years i think we've seen a revival of sample based production in scenes that have traditionally centered around synthesizer and drum machine workouts thanks to this easy availability, and block beattaz are a good example of that no?


Sure, and all that Really Matters, especially when I'm trying to keep people on a dancefloor, is whether the result sounds good. Take Chicago juke. The sample sources are generally atrocious, it isn't technically innovative or interesting, but it sounds dope, and - speaking of hyperlocal scenes - it's the present manifestation of an insular evolution that has been going on for a couple of decades, and it's easy to be dismissive of it without knowing that. Ditto Bmore club, Nola bounce, and so on.

It's cool that you guys dog-piled on me for making a kind of joke about being a production snob, though.

#423
[account deactivated]
#424
glue cru don't joke. jokes is for jokers, smoke is for smokers



#425
that's interesting you don't think footwork isn't technically innovative or interesting LandBeluga, that's what i've found most remarkable about that genre. those drum patterns don't fuck around and the sample flips are on some steve reich shit
#426

blinkandwheeze posted:

that's interesting you don't think footwork isn't technically innovative or interesting LandBeluga, that's what i've found most remarkable about that genre. those drum patterns don't fuck around and the sample flips are on some steve reich shit


I guess I can see how it sounds like it would be hard to do, but the technology that's out now makes most of the programming trivial imo. I've heard about Swizz Beats putting together beats in 10-15 minutes, and it wouldn't surprise me if Rashad, Earl, Roc et al make a lot of their beats within a similar time frame when inspiration hits.

#427
for someone who doesn't like juke or footwork, what do you consider to be the essential songs or albums to listen to (youtubes are encouraged)

#428
i don't think the time required to produce something is actually that correlative to technical innovation at all? like a footwork producer who bangs out a track a day might still be a thousand times more interesting, even if not of a better quality, than some ice cold dub techno producer or whatever who spends a week equalizing a kick drum
#429
Man, you guys getting so hung up on genres and image

this is why i listen to punk instead
#430

blinkandwheeze posted:

i don't think the time required to produce something is actually that correlative to technical innovation at all? like a footwork producer who bangs out a track a day might still be a thousand times more interesting, even if not of a better quality, than some ice cold dub techno producer or whatever who spends a week equalizing a kick drum


Maybe I unfairly conflated effort and innovation.

#431
let me show u how to make that crack!
#432

shermanstick posted:

for someone who doesn't like juke or footwork, what do you consider to be the essential songs or albums to listen to (youtubes are encouraged)


A good starting point is the Bangs & Works and Ghettoteknitianz compilations on Project Mu. A couple of my favourites from them:



DJ Earl's Triple Threat EP is really good too:


And maybe listen to this mix by Rashad and Spinn:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0hTcg695rEp
(wouldn't embed)

Venturing beyond Chicago, Patrice & Friends is one of my favourite juke projects:

#433

Ironicwarcriminal posted:

let me show u how to make that crack!


how to spend that money how to make that back

#434
im mad about rhymes
#435

LandBeluga posted:

Ironicwarcriminal posted:

let me show u how to make that crack!

how to spend that money how to make that back



i don't like that song, it strikes me as an ode to exploitation and misogyny

#436


#437

Ironicwarcriminal posted:

LandBeluga posted:

Ironicwarcriminal posted:

let me show u how to make that crack!

how to spend that money how to make that back

i don't like that song, it strikes me as an ode to exploitation and misogyny


Welcome to hip-hop.

#438
#439
#440

LandBeluga posted:

shermanstick posted:

for someone who doesn't like juke or footwork, what do you consider to be the essential songs or albums to listen to (youtubes are encouraged)

A good starting point is the Bangs & Works and Ghettoteknitianz compilations on Project Mu. A couple of my favourites from them:



DJ Earl's Triple Threat EP is really good too:


i really dig heaven sent and the dj earl joint, i'll check it out, thx
And maybe listen to this mix by Rashad and Spinn:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0hTcg695rEp
(wouldn't embed)

Venturing beyond Chicago, Patrice & Friends is one of my favourite juke projects: