Edited by NEOADMINISTRATOR ()
http://noisey.vice.com/blog/my-thoughts-on-this-whole-danny-brown-oral-sex-thing
thirdplace posted:hey cycloneboi didja see this?
http://noisey.vice.com/blog/my-thoughts-on-this-whole-danny-brown-oral-sex-thing
That is fucked up to hell. My prayers are with Danny Brown as we type.
*stone cold steve austin appears out of nowhere and chokeslams you through a folding table covered in printouts of your own terrible posts, instantly shattering every bone in your body and driving you inSane. you are peeing your pants while he towers over you with his sweaty, glistening, incredibly toned and masculine body and leans down to whisper in your ear, "Misandry is real." now your crying lol. noone has ever been this owned*
me, watching ringside while smoking a pallmall: "Brutal."
thirdplace posted:hey cycloneboi didja see this?
http://noisey.vice.com/blog/my-thoughts-on-this-whole-danny-brown-oral-sex-thing
Ironicwarcriminal posted:i'm tired of you discussing sexuality when you have so little experience Cycloneboy, i might as well be listening to a Salafist's opinion on how to eat pussy
I have plenty of experience with feminist rape apologia, I've frequently been on the receiving end of it, see for example the garbage EmanuelaOrlandi used to post at me.
thirdplace posted:my buddy was at that show and generally backs up that lady's version of the events, at least insofar as neither him nor anyone he knew there noticed or heard about it until the next morning
I like you, thirdplace, you seem to have your head screwed on pretty straight with respect to this issue. God bless.
ilmdge posted:Getfiscal stop freeing this lunatic without an assignment. At least make him do some work before he returns to spread his MRA paranoia. To be clear I'm not saying he should be in IFAP forever and never allowed back but jeez. At least make him work for it.
It's not "MRA paranoia" to believe that feminists frequently engage in rape apologia - it is an objective observation of reality.
ilmdge posted:Cycloneboy I agree with you it's bad when people literally say a man being raped doesn't count or matter. But that's not a problem that rears its head often. It has happened, but making an issue of it is paranoia.
Right... it doesn't happen often. That's why the CDC's recent study doesn't count rape by envelopment as rape? That's why the FBI UCR's recent redefinition didn't redefine rape to include rape by envelopment? That's why the law of the land in the UK requires the victim of rape to be penetrated by the offender's penis in order for it to count? That's why women's groups in India successfully lobbied to prevent the institution of gender-neutral rape laws? Oh, wait, I forgot, it only matters if it passes some arbitrary standard set by the God Of What Matters, Ilmdge.
Cycloneboy posted:ilmdge posted:Cycloneboy I agree with you it's bad when people literally say a man being raped doesn't count or matter. But that's not a problem that rears its head often. It has happened, but making an issue of it is paranoia.
Right... it doesn't happen often. That's why the CDC's recent study doesn't count rape by envelopment as rape? That's why the FBI UCR's recent redefinition didn't redefine rape to include rape by envelopment? That's why the law of the land in the UK requires the victim of rape to be penetrated by the offender's penis in order for it to count? That's why women's groups in India successfully lobbied to prevent the institution of gender-neutral rape laws? Oh, wait, I forgot, it only matters if it passes some arbitrary standard set by the God Of What Matters, Ilmdge.
Every one of those sentences is correct except the last one. Just remove the question marks and you've got it!
ilmdge posted:Cycloneboy posted:ilmdge posted:Cycloneboy I agree with you it's bad when people literally say a man being raped doesn't count or matter. But that's not a problem that rears its head often. It has happened, but making an issue of it is paranoia.
Right... it doesn't happen often. That's why the CDC's recent study doesn't count rape by envelopment as rape? That's why the FBI UCR's recent redefinition didn't redefine rape to include rape by envelopment? That's why the law of the land in the UK requires the victim of rape to be penetrated by the offender's penis in order for it to count? That's why women's groups in India successfully lobbied to prevent the institution of gender-neutral rape laws? Oh, wait, I forgot, it only matters if it passes some arbitrary standard set by the God Of What Matters, Ilmdge.
Every one of those sentences is correct except the last one. Just remove the question marks and you've got it!
It doesn't make sense to say "it doesn't happen often" when there are massive institutions (the US, UK, and Indian governments, for example) that are actively perpetuating and continuing these policies with intentionality. It's incoherent.
Squalid posted:stop posting about this MRA shit or go back to your own horrible forum
It's not "MRA shit" to oppose rape, you fucker.
Cycloneboy posted:ilmdge posted:
Cycloneboy I agree with you it's bad when people literally say a man being raped doesn't count or matter. But that's not a problem that rears its head often. It has happened, but making an issue of it is paranoia.
Right... it doesn't happen often. That's why the CDC's recent study doesn't count rape by envelopment as rape? That's why the FBI UCR's recent redefinition didn't redefine rape to include rape by envelopment? That's why the law of the land in the UK requires the victim of rape to be penetrated by the offender's penis in order for it to count? That's why women's groups in India successfully lobbied to prevent the institution of gender-neutral rape laws? Oh, wait, I forgot, it only matters if it passes some arbitrary standard set by the God Of What Matters, Ilmdge.
quit being a hysterical whiny bitch
Cycloneboy posted:It doesn't make sense to say "it doesn't happen often" when there are massive institutions (the US, UK, and Indian governments, for example) that are actively perpetuating and continuing these policies with intentionality. It's incoherent.
Right... it (male rape) doesn't happen often. That's why the CDC's recent study doesn't count rape by envelopment as rape. That's why the FBI UCR's recent redefinition didn't redefine rape to include rape by envelopment. That's why the law of the land in the UK requires the victim of rape to be penetrated by the offender's penis in order for it to count. That's why women's groups in India successfully lobbied to prevent the institution of gender-neutral rape laws.
Ironicwarcriminal posted:Cycloneboy posted:ilmdge posted:
Cycloneboy I agree with you it's bad when people literally say a man being raped doesn't count or matter. But that's not a problem that rears its head often. It has happened, but making an issue of it is paranoia.
Right... it doesn't happen often. That's why the CDC's recent study doesn't count rape by envelopment as rape? That's why the FBI UCR's recent redefinition didn't redefine rape to include rape by envelopment? That's why the law of the land in the UK requires the victim of rape to be penetrated by the offender's penis in order for it to count? That's why women's groups in India successfully lobbied to prevent the institution of gender-neutral rape laws? Oh, wait, I forgot, it only matters if it passes some arbitrary standard set by the God Of What Matters, Ilmdge.quit being a hysterical whiny bitch
Fuck you.
My friend, you have your own forum. Go post in it.
Edited by babyhueypnewton ()
Cycloneboy posted:Ironicwarcriminal posted:
Cycloneboy posted:
ilmdge posted:
Cycloneboy I agree with you it's bad when people literally say a man being raped doesn't count or matter. But that's not a problem that rears its head often. It has happened, but making an issue of it is paranoia.
Right... it doesn't happen often. That's why the CDC's recent study doesn't count rape by envelopment as rape? That's why the FBI UCR's recent redefinition didn't redefine rape to include rape by envelopment? That's why the law of the land in the UK requires the victim of rape to be penetrated by the offender's penis in order for it to count? That's why women's groups in India successfully lobbied to prevent the institution of gender-neutral rape laws? Oh, wait, I forgot, it only matters if it passes some arbitrary standard set by the God Of What Matters, Ilmdge.
quit being a hysterical whiny bitch
Fuck you.
you get 'molested' by your mexican nanny or something Kingwood boy?
Ironicwarcriminal posted:you get 'molested' by your mexican nanny or something Kingwood boy?
Why is molested in quotes here?
Cycloneboy posted:Ironicwarcriminal posted:
you get 'molested' by your mexican nanny or something Kingwood boy?
Why is molested in quotes here?
because any 'inappropriate' touching carried out on young males by women in positions of authority is excusable based on the oppression and enslavement that they as a gender have suffered for uncountable millennial.
like, have you not heard of the term reparations before or what?
together...
if what you say is true, then go get help that doesn't involve publicly embarrassing yourself. the internet is not a good place for getting over ptsd, especially since everyone is tired of your 'internet persona'. thank you.
Lessons posted:to answer the question in the op: BECAUSE STONE COLD SAID SO!!
*stone cold steve austin appears out of nowhere and chokeslams you through a folding table covered in printouts of your own terrible posts, instantly shattering every bone in your body and driving you inSane. you are peeing your pants while he towers over you with his sweaty, glistening, incredibly toned and masculine body and leans down to whisper in your ear, "Misandry is real." now your crying lol. noone has ever been this owned*
me, watching ringside while smoking a pallmall: "Brutal."
nice post. but stone cold steve austin does the stone cold stunner, not a chokeslam. otherwise excellent effort.
Ironicwarcriminal posted:quit being a hysterical whiny bitch
--Steubenville football team
and look how you treat him. you insult him, marginalize him, imprison him, silence his voice. you gaslight him, tell him his concerns are emotional and unwarranted. you define him as "hysterical", itself an incredibly gendered insult. You hate Cycloneboy because he reveals all your true feelings about women, he exposes how you would really treat a woman were there were no potential sexual "prize" to be gained through your saccharine and disingenuously polite and manufactured behavior towards her. Cycloneboy is a mirror of your own misogyny, and a symbol of what men would be without the Patriarchy. and the idea of that future is too much for you to bear
Cycloneboy posted:Why is molested in quotes here?
because adult women can't 'molest' male children
EmanuelaOrlandi posted:damn i didnt even see iwc used my troll cycloneboy idea already
It’s alright there’s plenty of room around cycloneboy’s cot for two touchy-feely matrons such as ourselves